Legal-accuracy validation
Review all legal and process claims on the understanding, resources, and Katia’s Law pages — Hague accuracy, Central Authority facts, prevention-program descriptions.
Project KATIA · For professionals
We are seeking qualified professionals to review, challenge, and improve what we have built — an initial framework of research, plain-language explainers, a verified resource index, a privacy model, and an early policy proposal. Your expertise can make it safer, more accurate, and more useful.
Please read this first
No attorney-client relationship is created by contacting us. Do not send confidential case information, children’s records, or sensitive evidence through public channels. We do not accept case information, and we do not perform outreach on behalf of anyone. For a specific situation, contact the relevant official organization or a qualified professional directly.
Adversarial review is explicitly welcome. On Katia’s Law, we want people who can argue against it — a proposal that survives its own hardest questions is more credible than one that has never been challenged.
Pro bono collaboration
We are an early-stage organization: not incorporated, not a nonprofit, and not tax-exempt. We cannot offer fees, retainers, or tax benefits. What we can offer is meaningful work — improving tools and resources that may help families in crisis — and a review process that takes your time seriously and credits your contribution.
If you are a qualified professional willing to donate time to review, mentor, or challenge this program, contact us →
What we need help with
Each item below is a concrete request. If you can help with one, tell us which — a concise subject helps us route it correctly.
Review all legal and process claims on the understanding, resources, and Katia’s Law pages — Hague accuracy, Central Authority facts, prevention-program descriptions.
Katia’s Law concepts: prevention-chain analysis, CPIAP/CBP interactions, constitutional, privacy, due-process, and domestic-violence stress-testing.
Country-specific accuracy of the resource index and contact directories; expansion priorities by jurisdiction.
Privacy architecture (GREEN-only public surface, publication-boundary policy), future-intake gating design, threat modeling.
Verify and expand the verified index — new countries, official-route changes, dead links, trustworthiness criteria.
Review the developing policy proposal’s concepts for feasibility, unintended consequences, and missing safeguards. (Internal draft language is not circulated publicly.)
For the Katia’s Law workstream: qualified legislative drafting or attorney review of concept-level language before any formal step.
Tell us your area of expertise and how much time you can offer. We will match it to the workstream where it helps most.
If you see a risk, an error, or a gap not listed here, that is exactly the kind of feedback we want. Challenge the framework.